feat(dissertation): improve on checklist section in background

pub/dissertation/chapters/background.tex

@@ -24,15 +24,32 @@
 % - Safety procedures being added
 % - Rates of accidents
 \begin{itemize}
-  \item 70-80\% of aviation accidents are attributed to human factors~\cite{faa-reasons}
+  \item 70-80\% of aviation accidents are attributed to human factors~\cite{faa:reasons}
 \end{itemize}
 
 \subsection{Checklists}
 \begin{itemize}
   \item Checklists have been shown to aid in minimizing human errors~\cite{manifesto}
-  \item However, checklists can be misleading and compromise the safety of the aircraft
-    due to them being either too confusing or taking too long to complete~\cite{nasa-design}
+  
+
+  \item However, according to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), the UK's aviation regulator:
+  \begin{itemize}
+    \item Checklists can be misleading and compromise the safety of the aircraft
+      due to them being either too confusing or taking too long to complete~\cite{nasa:design}
+    \item Other problems may include the crew skipping a step either unintentionally or by interruption,
+      or just failing to complete the checklist outright
+    \item The crew may also not be alerted to performance issues within the aircraft,
+      that running the checklist may cause~\cite{caa:design}
+  \end{itemize}
+
   \item That is why testing checklists are important to avoid these situations
+  
+  \item However, it is important to note that checklists does not prevent the human
+    factor of failure to use a checklist, like in the case of Northwest Airlines
+    Flight 255, where the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an investigatory board
+    for aviation accidents in the United States, determined that
+    \enquote{the probable cause of the accident was the flight crew's failure
+    to use the taxi checklist to ensure that the flaps and slats were extended for takeoff.}~\cite{ntsb:NWA255}
 \end{itemize}
 
 

pub/dissertation/chapters/introduction.tex

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 \section{Scene}
 \begin{itemize}
     \item Designing Emergency Checklists is difficult
-    \item Procedures in checklists must be tested in simulators~\cite{nasa-design},
+    \item Procedures in checklists must be tested in simulators~\cite{nasa:design},
       which usually means trained pilots test it, as the tests need
       to work consistently~\cite{manifesto} (making sure it's not lengthy,
       concise and gets critical procedures)
@@ -14,16 +14,16 @@
 
 \section{Motivation}
 \begin{itemize}
-  \item Testing procedures in checklists are often neglected~\cite{nasa-design}
+  \item Testing procedures in checklists are often neglected~\cite{nasa:design}
     \item There are some checklists that may not be fit
         for certain scenarios - e.g. ditching (water landing)
         checklist for US Airways Flight 1549 assumed at least one engine
-        was running~\cite{AWE1549}, but in this scenario, there were none
+        was running~\cite{ntsb:AWE1549}, but in this scenario, there were none
     \item Some checklists may make pilots \enquote{stuck}
       - not widely implemented, could be fixed with \enquote{opt out} points.
       e.g. US Airways 1549, plane below 3000ft, could have skip to
       later in the checklist to something like turn on APU, otherwise plane
-      will have limited control~\cite{AWE1549}.
+      will have limited control~\cite{ntsb:AWE1549}.
     \item Checklists may take too long to carry out - Swissair 111
 \end{itemize}
 

pub/dissertation/dissertation.sum

@@ -1 +1 @@
-4624
+4751

pub/dissertation/references.bib

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@report{AWE1549,
+@report{ntsb:AWE1549,
   author = {{National Tranportation Safety Board}},
   shortauthor = {NTSB},
   number = {PB2010-910403},
@@ -6,13 +6,23 @@
            and Subsequent Ditching on the Hudson River},
   type = {Technical Report},
   institution = {},
-  date = {2010},
+  year = {2010},
   month = {5},
   day = {3},
   url = {https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/DCA09MA026.aspx},
 }
 
-@article{nasa-checklist,
+@report{ntsb:NWA255,
+  author = {{National Tranportation Safety Board}},
+  shortauthor = {NTSB},
+  number = {PB88-910406},
+  title = {Aircraft Accident Report Northwest Airlines, Inc\. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport Romulus, Michigan},
+  year = {1987},
+  month = {08},
+  url = {https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR8805.pdf},
+}
+
+@article{nasa:checklist,
   author = {Burian, Barbara},
   year = {2006},
   month = {10},
@@ -24,7 +34,7 @@
   doi = {10.1177/154193120605000123},
 }
 
-@book{nasa-design,
+@book{nasa:design,
   year = {2016},
   month = {11},
   title = {Designing Flightdeck Procedures},
@@ -66,16 +76,26 @@
             },
 }
 
-@manual{caa-emergency,
+@manual{caa:emergency,
   author = {Civil Aviation Authority},
   title = {Aircraft Emergencies: Considerations for air traffic controllers},
-  number = {CAP745},
+  number = {CAP 745},
   year = {2005},
   month = {3},
   url = {https://www.caa.co.uk/cap745},
 }
 
-@techreport{faa-reasons,
+@manual{caa:design,
+  author = {Civil Aviation Authority},
+  title = {Guidance on the Design, Presentation and Use
+of Emergency and Abnormal Checklists},
+  number = {CAP 676},
+  year = {2006},
+  month = {08},
+  url = {https://www.caa.co.uk/cap745},
+}
+
+@techreport{faa:reasons,
   author = {Knecht, William R. and Lenz, Michael},
   title = {Causes of General Aviation Weather-Related, Non-Fatal Incidents:
            Analysis Using NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System Data},