mirror of
https://github.com/smyalygames/checklist-tester.git
synced 2026-01-01 09:18:43 +01:00
feat(dissertation): improve on checklist section in background
This commit is contained in:
@@ -24,15 +24,32 @@
|
||||
% - Safety procedures being added
|
||||
% - Rates of accidents
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item 70-80\% of aviation accidents are attributed to human factors~\cite{faa-reasons}
|
||||
\item 70-80\% of aviation accidents are attributed to human factors~\cite{faa:reasons}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Checklists}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Checklists have been shown to aid in minimizing human errors~\cite{manifesto}
|
||||
\item However, checklists can be misleading and compromise the safety of the aircraft
|
||||
due to them being either too confusing or taking too long to complete~\cite{nasa-design}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\item However, according to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), the UK's aviation regulator:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Checklists can be misleading and compromise the safety of the aircraft
|
||||
due to them being either too confusing or taking too long to complete~\cite{nasa:design}
|
||||
\item Other problems may include the crew skipping a step either unintentionally or by interruption,
|
||||
or just failing to complete the checklist outright
|
||||
\item The crew may also not be alerted to performance issues within the aircraft,
|
||||
that running the checklist may cause~\cite{caa:design}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\item That is why testing checklists are important to avoid these situations
|
||||
|
||||
\item However, it is important to note that checklists does not prevent the human
|
||||
factor of failure to use a checklist, like in the case of Northwest Airlines
|
||||
Flight 255, where the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an investigatory board
|
||||
for aviation accidents in the United States, determined that
|
||||
\enquote{the probable cause of the accident was the flight crew's failure
|
||||
to use the taxi checklist to ensure that the flaps and slats were extended for takeoff.}~\cite{ntsb:NWA255}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
||||
\section{Scene}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Designing Emergency Checklists is difficult
|
||||
\item Procedures in checklists must be tested in simulators~\cite{nasa-design},
|
||||
\item Procedures in checklists must be tested in simulators~\cite{nasa:design},
|
||||
which usually means trained pilots test it, as the tests need
|
||||
to work consistently~\cite{manifesto} (making sure it's not lengthy,
|
||||
concise and gets critical procedures)
|
||||
@@ -14,16 +14,16 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Motivation}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Testing procedures in checklists are often neglected~\cite{nasa-design}
|
||||
\item Testing procedures in checklists are often neglected~\cite{nasa:design}
|
||||
\item There are some checklists that may not be fit
|
||||
for certain scenarios - e.g. ditching (water landing)
|
||||
checklist for US Airways Flight 1549 assumed at least one engine
|
||||
was running~\cite{AWE1549}, but in this scenario, there were none
|
||||
was running~\cite{ntsb:AWE1549}, but in this scenario, there were none
|
||||
\item Some checklists may make pilots \enquote{stuck}
|
||||
- not widely implemented, could be fixed with \enquote{opt out} points.
|
||||
e.g. US Airways 1549, plane below 3000ft, could have skip to
|
||||
later in the checklist to something like turn on APU, otherwise plane
|
||||
will have limited control~\cite{AWE1549}.
|
||||
will have limited control~\cite{ntsb:AWE1549}.
|
||||
\item Checklists may take too long to carry out - Swissair 111
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user