diff --git a/pub/proposal/proposal.pdf b/pub/proposal/proposal.pdf
index 8541239..70c74e3 100644
Binary files a/pub/proposal/proposal.pdf and b/pub/proposal/proposal.pdf differ
diff --git a/pub/proposal/proposal.tex b/pub/proposal/proposal.tex
index 4d63327..1f15446 100644
--- a/pub/proposal/proposal.tex
+++ b/pub/proposal/proposal.tex
@@ -125,64 +125,64 @@ the checklist.
 \lfcomment{On CL book, Ch1 is about nature of where CL work best; Ch2 explains what a CL is and isn't; Ch3 you can ignore, it talks about checklist for unknown/unexpected scenarios (advanced CL) in building; Ch4 he discussed CL with chefs; Ch5 talks about CL failures and why; \textbf{Ch6 is about Boeing's CL ``factory''}; Ch7 and 8 are about applying the CL he came up with, here you get the examples of test/baseline criteria for CL; Ch9 he explains it in his own practice (this is daunting read)!.}
 \subsection{Key Background Sources}
 \begin{xltabular}{\linewidth}{p{8em} X}
-    \toprule
-    Resource & Info \\
-    \midrule \endfirsthead
-    
-    \toprule
-    \multicolumn{2}{l}{Key Background Sources (continued)} \\
-    Resource & Info \\
-    \midrule \endhead
+  \toprule
+  Resource & Info \\
+  \midrule \endfirsthead
+  
+  \toprule
+  \multicolumn{2}{l}{Key Background Sources (continued)} \\
+  Resource & Info \\
+  \midrule \endhead
 
-    \midrule
-    \multicolumn{2}{r}{Continued\dots} \\
-    \bottomrule \endfoot
+  \midrule
+  \multicolumn{2}{r}{Continued\dots} \\
+  \bottomrule \endfoot
 
 
-    \bottomrule \endlastfoot
+  \bottomrule \endlastfoot
 
-    \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{US Airways 1549 NTSB Investigation~\cite{AWE1549}}}
-    & \textbf{Description:} An investigation on an aircraft that
-        suffered from a dual engine failure from a bird strike
-        forcing the pilots to land on the Hudson River. \\
-    & \textbf{Reason:} The investigation found that the QRH was too
-        lengthy and the pilots' used their experience to prioritize
-        essential actions outside the QRH to keep the aircraft in control. \\
+  \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{US Airways 1549 NTSB Investigation~\cite{AWE1549}}}
+  & \textbf{Description:} An investigation on an aircraft that
+      suffered from a dual engine failure from a bird strike
+      forcing the pilots to land on the Hudson River. \\
+  & \textbf{Reason:} The investigation found that the QRH was too
+      lengthy and the pilots' used their experience to prioritize
+      essential actions outside the QRH to keep the aircraft in control. \\
 
-    \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Design Guidance for Emergency and Abnormal Checklists in Aviation~\cite{nasa-checklist}}}
-    & \textbf{Description:} Provides the challenges and
-      requirements for designing aviation checklists.
-      It also talks about the problems that are in 
-      checklist designing. \\
-    & \textbf{Reason:} This will guide for certain aspects to
-      look out for whilst testing checklists, such as if
-      certain actions require waiting, or if it could be
-      completed in a different order. \\
+  \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Design Guidance for Emergency and Abnormal Checklists in Aviation~\cite{nasa-checklist}}}
+  & \textbf{Description:} Provides the challenges and
+    requirements for designing aviation checklists.
+    It also talks about the problems that are in 
+    checklist designing. \\
+  & \textbf{Reason:} This will guide for certain aspects to
+    look out for whilst testing checklists, such as if
+    certain actions require waiting, or if it could be
+    completed in a different order. \\
 
-    \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Designing Flightdeck Procedures~\cite{nasa-design}}}
-    & \textbf{Description:} Guidance on the process of developing checklists,
-      which includes steps to focus on and how to make a well designed
-      checklist.\\
-    & \textbf{Reason:} This report includes steps on testing checklists
-      which is the focus of this project and will provide guidance 
-      on how the tests should be carried out. \\
+  \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Designing Flightdeck Procedures~\cite{nasa-design}}}
+  & \textbf{Description:} Guidance on the process of developing checklists,
+    which includes steps to focus on and how to make a well designed
+    checklist.\\
+  & \textbf{Reason:} This report includes steps on testing checklists
+    which is the focus of this project and will provide guidance 
+    on how the tests should be carried out. \\
 
-    \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{The Checklist Manifesto~\cite{manifesto}}}
-    & \textbf{Description:} Insight into the steps of implementing
-    a checklist in medicine whilst learning about how checklists are
-    designed and used in industries such as aviation and construction. \\
-    & \textbf{Reason:} Checklist designer from Boeing is interviewed
-    where they go through the vital design choices to make them effective
-    and how they gain pilots' trust to use checklists. \\
+  \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{The Checklist Manifesto~\cite{manifesto}}}
+  & \textbf{Description:} Insight into the steps of implementing
+  a checklist in medicine whilst learning about how checklists are
+  designed and used in industries such as aviation and construction. \\
+  & \textbf{Reason:} Checklist designer from Boeing is interviewed
+  where they go through the vital design choices to make them effective
+  and how they gain pilots' trust to use checklists. \\
 
-    \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Intraindividual Variability in Basic Reaction Time Predicts Middle-Aged and Older Pilots’ Flight Simulator Performance~\cite{pilot-reaction}}}
-    & \textbf{Description:} Tested 236 pilots aged between 40-69 years old, 
-    to measure their reaction times and how they are affected 
-    by age. The tests were conducted by Stanford
-    University and MIRECC, and results have been peer reviewed. \\
-    & \textbf{Reason:} Gives insightful statistics into pilots 
-    reaction times and how they will affect the performance 
-    when carrying out procedures in checklists. \\
+  \multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{8em}{Intraindividual Variability in Basic Reaction Time Predicts Middle-Aged and Older Pilots’ Flight Simulator Performance~\cite{pilot-reaction}}}
+  & \textbf{Description:} Tested 236 pilots aged between 40-69 years old, 
+  to measure their reaction times and how they are affected 
+  by age. The tests were conducted by Stanford
+  University and MIRECC, and results have been peer reviewed. \\
+  & \textbf{Reason:} Gives insightful statistics into pilots 
+  reaction times and how they will affect the performance 
+  when carrying out procedures in checklists. \\
 \end{xltabular}
 
 % Aim (or hypothesis) and Objectives