Quartz sync: Apr 2, 2025, 4:55 PM
All checks were successful
/ Deploy to Cloudflare Pages (push) Successful in 2m16s
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Definition
|
||||
A [[Complex Functions|complex function]] $f(z)$ can be seen as a function of two real variables. Hence
|
||||
$$f(z) = f(x + iy) = f(x, y).$$
|
||||
When interpreted appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!example] For instance
|
||||
> $$f(z) = z^2 = (x + iy)^2 = x^2 - y^2 + 2ixy$$
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]], we should expect **relations** between $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$.
|
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Definition
|
||||
A function $f : D \to \mathbb{C}$ is **differentiable** at $z \in \mathbb{C}$ if the following limit exists
|
||||
$$\lim_{ \Delta z \to \infty } \frac{f(z + \Delta z) - f(z)}{\Delta z}.$$
|
||||
We denote by $f'(z)$.
|
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Definition
|
||||
Let $f: D \to \mathbb{C}$ be a function with domain $D$.
|
||||
|
||||
We say that $f$ is **entire** if $f$ is **entire** if $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] everywhere (so $D = \mathbb{C}$).
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Definition
|
||||
Let $f: D \to \mathbb{C}$ be a function with domain $D$.
|
||||
|
||||
We say that $f$ is **holomorphic** at $z_{0}$ if $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] in an [[Open Sets|open]] disk (entered at $z_{0}$).
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Remark on naming of "holomorphic"
|
||||
> Many sources use the term **analytic** instead of holomorphic.
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 11 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 18 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 11 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 18 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 21 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 62 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 21 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 62 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 9.5 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 16 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 9.2 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 16 KiB |
BIN
content/Exercises/Complex Analysis/Exercises week 1.pdf
Normal file
129
content/Lectures/Lecture 19 - Derivatives.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
lecture: 19
|
||||
date: 2025-03-24
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Differentiable
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
A function $f : D \to \mathbb{C}$ is **differentiable** at $z \in \mathbb{C}$ if the following limit exists
|
||||
$$\lim_{ \Delta z \to \infty } \frac{f(z + \Delta z) - f(z)}{\Delta z}.$$
|
||||
We denote by $f'(z)$.
|
||||
|
||||
The same thing is also defined here: [[Differentiable]]
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
Consider $f(z) = z$. We have:
|
||||
$$\frac{f(z + \Delta z) - f(z)}{\Delta z} = \frac{z + \Delta z}{\Delta z} = 1 .$$
|
||||
Hence $f'(z) = 1$.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
We have general results to compute derivatives, as in the real case.
|
||||
# Proposition
|
||||
Suppose $f$ and $g$ are differentiable at $z \in \mathbb{C}$. Then:
|
||||
1. $(af(z) + bg(z))' = af'(z) + bg'(z)$ for any $a, b \in \mathbb{C}$,
|
||||
2. $(f(z)g(z))' = f'(z) g(z) + f(z) g'(z)$,
|
||||
3. Also a quotient rule.
|
||||
|
||||
Some terminologies which will be important to understand the rest:
|
||||
- [[Holomorphic]]
|
||||
- [[Entire]]
|
||||
|
||||
> [!example]
|
||||
> Any polynomial $P(z) = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} a k z^{k}$ is an [[Entire|entire]] function (follows from the proposition).
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
Consider $f(z) = \; \mid z \mid^{2} = z \bar{z}$. This is not going to be [[Holomorphic|holomorphic]].
|
||||
|
||||
We compute:
|
||||
$$\frac{f(z+ \Delta z) - f(z)}{\Delta z} = \frac{\mid z + \Delta z \mid^{2} = \mid z \mid^{2}}{\Delta z}$$
|
||||
> [!note]
|
||||
> We say that $z = x + iy$, hence $\Delta z = a + ib$.
|
||||
|
||||
![[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.00.27.excalidraw.dark.svg]]
|
||||
%%[[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.00.27.excalidraw.md|🖋 Edit in Excalidraw]], and the [[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.00.27.excalidraw.light.svg|light exported image]]%%
|
||||
$$= \frac{(x + a)^2 + (y + b)^2 - x^2 - y^2}{a + ib} = \frac{a^2 + b^2 + 2(ax + by)}{a + ib}.$$
|
||||
Consider the real direction.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note] Write
|
||||
> $$\Delta z = \Delta x$$
|
||||
|
||||
$$\lim_{ \underbrace{\Delta x \to 0}_{a \to 0} } \frac{f(z + \Delta x) - f(z)}{\Delta x} = \lim_{ a \to 0 } \frac{a^2 + 2ax}{a} = 2x$$
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly for the imaginary axis
|
||||
> [!note] Write
|
||||
> $$\Delta z = i \Delta y$$
|
||||
|
||||
$$\lim_{ \underbrace{i \Delta y \to 0}_{b \to 0} } \frac{f(z + i \Delta y) - f(z)}{i \Delta y} = \lim_{ b \to 0 } \frac{b^2 + 2by}{ib} = -2iy.$$
|
||||
This means that $f$ is **not** [[Differentiable|differentiable]] at $z \neq 0$.
|
||||
# Cauchy-Riemann Equations
|
||||
A [[Complex Functions|complex function]] $f(z)$ can be seen as a function of two real variables. Hence
|
||||
$$f(z) = f(x + iy) = f(x, y).$$
|
||||
When interpreted appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!example] For instance
|
||||
> $$f(z) = z^2 = (x + iy)^2 = x^2 - y^2 + 2ixy$$
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]], we should expect **relations** between $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$.
|
||||
|
||||
The same thing is also defined here: [[Cauchy-Riemann Equations]]
|
||||
# Theorem
|
||||
Let $z_{0} = x_{0} + iy_{0}$.
|
||||
1. Suppose $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] at $z_{0}$. Then $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ exists and have $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x_{0}, y_{0}) = -i \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} (x_{0}, y_{0}).$$
|
||||
> [!info]- Visual Representation
|
||||
>
|
||||
> ![[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.13.06.excalidraw.dark.svg]]
|
||||
%%[[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.13.06.excalidraw.md|🖋 Edit in Excalidraw]], and the [[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.13.06.excalidraw.light.svg|light exported image]]%%
|
||||
|
||||
2. Suppose $f$ is such that:
|
||||
- $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ exists at $(x_{0}, y_{0})$,
|
||||
- they are [[Continuous|continuous]] in a small disk centred at $(x_{0}, y_{0})$.
|
||||
Then $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ satisfy the condition above and $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] at $z_{0}$.
|
||||
3. In both cases, we have $f'(z_{0}) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x_{0}, y_{0})$.
|
||||
## Proof
|
||||
### For 1.
|
||||
Since $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] at $z_{0}$, the following limits exists
|
||||
$$f'(z_{0}) = \lim_{ \Delta z \to 0 } \frac{f(z_{0} + \Delta z) - f(z_{0})}{\Delta z}.$$
|
||||
> [!info]- Visual representation
|
||||
> ![[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.32.41.excalidraw.dark.svg]]
|
||||
%%[[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.32.41.excalidraw.md|🖋 Edit in Excalidraw]], and the [[Drawing 2025-03-24 11.32.41.excalidraw.light.svg|light exported image]]%%
|
||||
|
||||
$$f(z) = f(x, y)$$
|
||||
|
||||
First we take $\Delta z$ **real**, so $\Delta z = \Delta x$. Then
|
||||
$$f'(z_{0}) = \lim_{ \Delta x \to 0 } \frac{f(x_{0} + \Delta x) - f(x_{0}, y_{0})}{\Delta x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x_{0}, y_{0}).$$
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Next take $\Delta z$ to be purely imaginary ($\Delta x, \Delta y \in \mathbb{R}$), so $\Delta z = i \Delta y$
|
||||
($z_{0} + i \Delta y = x_{0} + i(y_{0} + \Delta y)$)
|
||||
|
||||
Then:
|
||||
$$f'(z_{0}) = \lim_{ \Delta y \to 0 } \frac{f(x_{0}, y_{0} + \Delta y) = f(x_{0}, y_{0})}{i \Delta y} = -i \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x_{0}, y_{0}).$$
|
||||
The two expressions must coincide, since $f$ is [[Differentiable|differentiable]] at $z_{0}$.
|
||||
### For 2.
|
||||
It is more complicated to prove. You can find the proof in the references on Canvas for the course.
|
||||
### For 3.
|
||||
Shown in [[#For 1.]]
|
||||
# Decomposition
|
||||
We can decompose any $f : D \to \mathbb{C}$ into its **real** and **imaginary** part. We write
|
||||
$$f(z) = f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y).$$
|
||||
or $\mathrm{Re}f = u$ and $\mathrm{Im} f = v$
|
||||
## Corollary
|
||||
With notation as before, we have
|
||||
$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y},\ \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}.$$
|
||||
### Proof
|
||||
By the [[#Theorem|previous theorem]], we have
|
||||
$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = -i \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}.$$
|
||||
Write $f = u + iv$. Then
|
||||
$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = -i \frac {\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}.$$
|
||||
Comparing real and imaginary parts gives the result.
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
Consider $f(z) = z^2$.
|
||||
This is seen to be [[Holomorphic|holomorphic]] (in at least two ways).
|
||||
|
||||
One way is
|
||||
$$f'(z) = (zz)' = z'z + zz' = zz.$$
|
||||
|
||||
Another way is to use the [[Cauchy-Riemann Equations]]. We have
|
||||
$$z^2 = (x + iy)^2 = (x^2 - y^2) + 2ixy.$$
|
||||
So here
|
||||
$$\mathrm{Re}f = u = x^2 - y^2,\ \mathrm{Im}f = v = 2xy.$$
|
||||
So one checks that $u$ and $v$ satisfy the [[Cauchy-Riemann Equations]].
|
||||
Since the derivatives are [[Continuous|continuous]], we get that $f = u + iv$ is [[Holomorphic|holomorphic]].
|
@ -27,3 +27,4 @@ title: ACIT4330 Lecture Notes
|
||||
- [[Lecture 17 - Lp Spaces]]
|
||||
# Complex Analysis
|
||||
- [[Lecture 18 - Complex Analysis]]
|
||||
- [[Lecture 19 - Derivatives]]
|